Jump to content


Photo

Twenty-Five Rules of Disinformation

Pcychology psyops propaganda techniques disinformation

58 replies to this topic

#11 status - Honey Poet

status - Honey Poet
  • Guests

Posted 22 September 2015 - 09:11 AM

British Spies Used Sex and 'Dirty Tricks'


7edcd6a53d7547e694b5ceef10981907.jpg


British spies have developed "dirty tricks" for use against nations, hackers, terror groups, suspected criminals and arms dealers that include releasing computer viruses, spying on journalists and diplomats, jamming phones and computers, and using sex to lure targets into "honey traps."

Documents taken from the National Security Agency by Edward Snowden and exclusively obtained by NBC News describe techniques developed by a secret British spy unit called the Joint Threat Research and Intelligence Group (JTRIG) as part of a growing mission to go on offense and attack adversaries ranging from Iran to the hacktivists of Anonymous. According to the documents, which come from presentations prepped in 2010 and 2012 for NSA cyber spy conferences, the agency's goal was to "destroy, deny, degrade [and] disrupt" enemies by "discrediting" them, planting misinformation and shutting down their communications.

 

Bzzzzzzzz!

 

 

 


  • 0

#12 status - Bzzzzzz

status - Bzzzzzz
  • Guests

Posted 22 September 2015 - 09:20 AM

British Spies Used Sex and 'Dirty Tricks'


7edcd6a53d7547e694b5ceef10981907.jpg

British spies have developed "dirty tricks" for use against nations, hackers, terror groups, suspected criminals and arms dealers that include releasing computer viruses, spying on journalists and diplomats, jamming phones and computers, and using sex to lure targets into "honey traps."

Documents taken from the National Security Agency by Edward Snowden and exclusively obtained by NBC News describe techniques developed by a secret British spy unit called the Joint Threat Research and Intelligence Group (JTRIG) as part of a growing mission to go on offense and attack adversaries ranging from Iran to the hacktivists of Anonymous. According to the documents, which come from presentations prepped in 2010 and 2012 for NSA cyber spy conferences, the agency's goal was to "destroy, deny, degrade [and] disrupt" enemies by "discrediting" them, planting misinformation and shutting down their communications.

 

Bzzzzzzzz!

 

Busy little bees

 

d8d4d599a77e655a2d9f3b2e46cceb7d.jpg

 

:kissmes:


  • 0

#13 status - Jacob

status - Jacob
  • Guests

Posted 22 September 2015 - 09:29 AM

Busy little bees

 

d8d4d599a77e655a2d9f3b2e46cceb7d.jpg

 

:kissmes:

 

Honey, honey, show me what's funny!

 

;)


  • 0

#14 status - Bzzzzzz

status - Bzzzzzz
  • Guests

Posted 22 September 2015 - 09:34 AM

Honey, honey, show me what's funny!

 

;)

 

41pZ9xmgtzL._SX378_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg


  • 0

#15 status - Guest

status - Guest
  • Guests

Posted 22 September 2015 - 09:35 AM

they are not gods and never will be


  • 0

#16 status - 1

status - 1
  • Guests

Posted 28 September 2015 - 09:25 AM

1. Hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil. Regardless of what you know, don't discuss it -- especially if you are a public figure, news anchor, etc. If it's not reported, it didn't happen, and you never have to deal with the issues.
 
corporatenews.jpg
 
Who signs your paychecks, baby!
 
Your'e fired!
 
donaldtrump.gif
 

  • 0

#17 status - 2

status - 2
  • Guests

Posted 28 September 2015 - 09:32 AM

Become incredulous and indignant. Avoid discussing key issues and instead focus on side issues which can be used show the topic as being critical of some otherwise sacrosanct group or theme. This is also known as the 'How dare you!' gambit.
 
osama-cia.jpg
 
 
 
 
lolz.jpg
 

  • 0

#18 status - 3

status - 3
  • Guests

Posted 28 September 2015 - 09:40 AM

Create rumor mongers. Avoid discussing issues by describing all charges, regardless of venue or evidence, as mere rumors and wild accusations. Other derogatory terms mutually exclusive of truth may work as well. This method which works especially well with a silent press, because the only way the public can learn of the facts are through such 'arguable rumors'. If you can associate the material with the Internet, use this fact to certify it a 'wild rumor' from a 'bunch of kids on the Internet' which can have no basis in fact.
 
funny-cute-kids-cheeky1.jpg
 
 
 
 
ahumans-love-repetition.jpg
 
 
 
 
2gevvg7.jpg
 

  • 0

#19 status - 4

status - 4
  • Guests

Posted 28 September 2015 - 09:48 AM

Use a straw man. Find or create a seeming element of your opponent's argument which you can easily knock down to make yourself look good and the opponent to look bad. Either make up an issue you may safely imply exists based on your interpretation of the opponent/opponent arguments/situation, or select the weakest aspect of the weakest charges. Amplify their significance and destroy them in a way which appears to debunk all the charges, real and fabricated alike, while actually avoiding discussion of the real issues.
 
 
forum_troll.jpg
 
 
 

  • 0

#20 status - 5

status - 5
  • Guests

Posted 28 September 2015 - 09:52 AM

Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary 'attack the messenger' ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as 'kooks', 'right-wing', 'liberal', 'left-wing', 'terrorists', 'conspiracy buffs', 'radicals', 'militia', 'racists', 'religious fanatics', 'sexual deviates', and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues.
 
stay+mad.gif
 

  • 0



Reply to this topic



  



Similar Topics Collapse


Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: Pcychology, psyops, propaganda techniques, disinformation

7 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 7 guests, 0 anonymous users

IPB Skin By Virteq