Jump to content


Rufus Tullius

Member Since 17 Aug 2015
Offline Last Active Private
*****

Topics I've Started

Would You Like a Reading?

08 January 2018 - 10:20 PM

Expanding the definition of fun.
 
Writing is a medium of language. Artful reading enlarges our sense of language and understanding.
 
Most of todays reading is done to extract information and discard it once it's used. Artful reading takes the time to appreciate a thoughtful phrase or a nifty turn of words. 
 
Here are some questions to consider:
 
What do you bring to your reading?
Is there an anticipation?
Ever re-read a paragraph because you thought it was beautifully put together; just for the simple pleasure of it?
How about Laughing out loud at some unexpected word play? 
How many times do you return to a book you've read before and found new nuggets of understanding?
Are the words casual?
Refined?
Shifty?
Any disquises in fallacy?
What is the mood?
Is it formal or informal in language?
 
Literary fiction is alive and well. Classic literature gives us the examples for the many tools used by the past masters. Modern masters have taken this classic approach and added many more mediums of language to communicate our current modes of story telling. Humans have come a long way since the old fireside stories of the past.
 
Techno friction is a huge and growing epidemic. How many juxtapositions are artificially driven?
 
Confusion is a common approach to story telling. Juxtaposition is a common device used to portray a decent set of twisted images. A good writer will show the viewer all the twists and turns. Sometimes they're multi layered and offer new directions to explore when re-reading a particularly favorite book or story.
 
This thread will play in tandem with this one:
 
 
 
PortlyCleanBoaconstrictor-max-1mb.gif
 
:chuckle:

Rhetorical Devices Used in Literary Logic

23 May 2017 - 12:42 PM

I thought it would be cool to make a thread about logical fallacies. These little nutcrackers always get in the way of decent discourse. Too bad, too. So I figure learning about them in a little more detail would help distinguish the different types of literary devices used in the everyday media.
 
Today, I'll start off with the ad hominem attack. This one is used constantly. It's a favorite technique because it causes lots of discord among the arguers. It's so much easier to question an individuals personal associations rather than paying attention to the validity of the main argument. Ad hominems can be mistaken as a personal insult when the subtle nature is a different distinction. Blatant and clever insults against somebody make it hard for people to believe it isn't true. If you look at this rationally such techniques never provide a valid reason to disregard decent criticism. 
 
Ad hominem has great power to persuade as it leaves a large impression on the mind of the audience. It somehow causes bias from the audience. This is a flawed arguing technique as it causes judgments to made without evaluation of facts on logical grounds.
 
41675065527de2b7a191ce134ce4917be8718570

IPB Skin By Virteq