Jump to content


Replying to The College Conspiracy


Post Options

  or Cancel


Topic Summary

Neochkanum

Posted 10 October 2018 - 09:23 PM

I think Jimmys asking what the spaceplane like bit top right of the last image, near the Rendezvous point caption is. Im getting curious as well o: Also, first post, the leading spaceplane: What model is that?

Ghostly Machines

Posted 04 March 2018 - 11:58 AM

The Coddling of the American Mind

In the name of emotional well-being, college students are increasingly demanding protection from words and ideas they don’t like. Here’s why that’s disastrous for education—and mental health.

Something strange is happening at America’s colleges and universities. A movement is arising, undirected and driven largely by students, to scrub campuses clean of words, ideas, and subjects that might cause discomfort or give offense. Last December, Jeannie Suk wrote in an online article for The New Yorker about law students asking her fellow professors at Harvard not to teach rape law—or, in one case, even use the word violate (as in “that violates the law”) lest it cause students distress. In February, Laura Kipnis, a professor at Northwestern University, wrote an essay in The Chronicle of Higher Education describing a new campus politics of sexual paranoia—and was then subjected to a long investigation after students who were offended by the article and by a tweet she’d sent filed Title IX complaints against her. In June, a professor protecting himself with a pseudonym wrote an essay for Vox describing how gingerly he now has to teach. “I’m a Liberal Professor, and My Liberal Students Terrify Me,” the headline said. A number of popular comedians, including Chris Rock, have stopped performing on college campuses (see Caitlin Flanagan’s article in this month’s issue). Jerry Seinfeld and Bill Maher have publicly condemned the oversensitivity of college students, saying too many of them can’t take a joke.

Two terms have risen quickly from obscurity into common campus parlance. Microaggressions are small actions or word choices that seem on their face to have no malicious intent but that are thought of as a kind of violence nonetheless. For example, by some campus guidelines, it is a microaggression to ask an Asian American or Latino American “Where were you born?,” because this implies that he or she is not a real American. Trigger warnings are alerts that professors are expected to issue if something in a course might cause a strong emotional response. For example, some students have called for warnings that Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart describes racial violence and that F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby portrays misogyny and physical abuse, so that students who have been previously victimized by racism or domestic violence can choose to avoid these works, which they believe might “trigger” a recurrence of past trauma.

This new climate is slowly being institutionalized, and is affecting what can be said in the classroom, even as a basis for discussion. During the 2014–15 school year, for instance, the deans and department chairs at the 10 University of California system schools were presented by administrators at faculty leader-training sessions with examples of microaggressions. The list of offensive statements included: “America is the land of opportunity” and “I believe the most qualified person should get the job.”

The press has typically described these developments as a resurgence of political correctness. That’s partly right, although there are important differences between what’s happening now and what happened in the 1980s and ’90s. That movement sought to restrict speech (specifically hate speech aimed at marginalized groups), but it also challenged the literary, philosophical, and historical canon, seeking to widen it by including more-diverse perspectives. The current movement is largely about emotional well-being. More than the last, it presumes an extraordinary fragility of the collegiate psyche, and therefore elevates the goal of protecting students from psychological harm. The ultimate aim, it seems, is to turn campuses into “safe spaces” where young adults are shielded from words and ideas that make some uncomfortable. And more than the last, this movement seeks to punish anyone who interferes with that aim, even accidentally. You might call this impulse vindictive protectiveness. It is creating a culture in which everyone must think twice before speaking up, lest they face charges of insensitivity, aggression, or worse.

There’s a saying common in education circles: Don’t teach students what to think; teach them how to think. The idea goes back at least as far as Socrates. Today, what we call the Socratic method is a way of teaching that fosters critical thinking, in part by encouraging students to question their own unexamined beliefs, as well as the received wisdom of those around them. Such questioning sometimes leads to discomfort, and even to anger, on the way to understanding.

But vindictive protectiveness teaches students to think in a very different way. It prepares them poorly for professional life, which often demands intellectual engagement with people and ideas one might find uncongenial or wrong. The harm may be more immediate, too. A campus culture devoted to policing speech and punishing speakers is likely to engender patterns of thought that are surprisingly similar to those long identified by cognitive behavioral therapists as causes of depression and anxiety. The new protectiveness may be teaching students to think pathologically.

How Did We Get Here?

https://www.theatlan...an-mind/399356/


Posted 04 March 2018 - 11:29 AM

Ok, boys and girls...

 

Did you learn anything useful in college? Did it prepare you for the job you dreamed about? Was the debt incurred worth all the time you spent learning about things that should have been taught in elementary school?

 

 


Posted 24 February 2018 - 01:34 PM

student-debt-living-rugust-2011-top-rame

 


Feathers

Posted 06 October 2017 - 05:08 PM

This whole system starts from the cradle and ends with the grave...

 

The above article seems to imply a bubble is being created in the education industry.

 

Something like the real estate bubble debacle in 2007.

 

Too big to fail, too big to go to jail.

 

It's an untold historical truth.

 

It's been going on for quite some time.

 

These truths have exploded since the birth of the internet.

 

http://forum.chicken...ican-education/


Posted 06 October 2017 - 04:55 PM

More Than 40% of Student Borrowers Aren’t Making Payments
 
New figure raises worries that millions of them may never repay more than $200 billion owed 
 
The $1.3 Trillion Student Debt Bubble
 
The rise in delinquencies on student loans in the United States (SPY) (IWM) (QQQ) can be partially attributed to the accelerated rise in college tuition and fees, which haven’t been supported enough by an increase in jobs or salaries.
 
Student debt makes up 10% of the total debt
 
A 50% rise over five years
 
Aggregate student debt has risen more than 50% over the past five years. In that same period, housing debt, or mortgages, declined 2%. Auto loans have increased about 52%, credit card loans have risen 2%, and revolving debt has declined 24%.
 
There has been a marked rise in serious delinquencies on student loans over the years. Serious delinquency means a loan is more than 90 days past due.
 
Baby Boomer debt has been rising, too
 
Amazon is looking to enter the student loan market
 
Amazon (AMZN) is looking to enter what has become a billion-dollar student loan industry in the United States. It has entered into a deal with Wells Fargo to provide a 0.5% interest rate discount to its Prime Student subscribers on their Wells Fargo student loans.
 
 
 
 

Posted 04 January 2017 - 08:16 PM

The-50-States-Of-America-If-They-Were-Ac


Posted 23 December 2016 - 06:20 PM

8f46ae871dd7850f1b515e9171924ebd.jpg


Posted 26 September 2016 - 02:01 AM

Science and math. Those seem to be the big subjects TPTB want to push hard on the people. All well and good. What about philosophy! Different theologies. Logic, grammar, and rhetoric. How fallacies are used on people who know nothing about these fundamental classics of free thinking and reasonable people. 

 

Remember a nation of workers is always better than a  nation of thinkers. That's what has been done to us all. Worker rights? What about thinking rights?

 

Screw the TPTB and their agenda. May it fail and bring those who support it to their knees.


Posted 28 June 2016 - 07:59 AM

 

Some legitimate reasons to think about concerning the current state of the American Education system. 
 
 
The Untold Historical Truth of American Education
 
 
 
 
...and...
 
 
The College Conspiracy
 
 

 

 

training-education-college-diploma-degre


Review the complete topic (launches new window)

IPB Skin By Virteq