What does Google know about me?
Did you know that unlike searching on DuckDuckGo, when you search on Google, they keep your search history forever?
That means they know every search you’ve ever done on Google. That alone is pretty scary, but it’s just the shallow end of the very deep pool of data that they try to collect on people.
What most people don’t realize is that even if you don’t use any Google products directly, they’re still trying to track as much as they can about you. Google trackers have been found on 75% of the top million websites. This means they’re also trying to track most everywhere you go on the internet, trying to slurp up your browsing history!
Most people also don’t know that Google runs most of the ads you see across the internet and in apps – you know those ones that follow you around everywhere? Yup, that’s Google, too. They aren’t really a search company anymore – they’re a tracking company. They are tracking as much as they can for these annoying and intrusive ads, including recording every time you see them, where you saw them, if you clicked on them, etc.
But even that’s not all…
Replying to Surveillance and Misinformation!
Posted 03 March 2019 - 12:49 AM
What does Google know about me?
Posted 22 February 2019 - 04:31 PM
Tucker Carlson reacts to Sean Parker's comments about the negative consequences of Facebook and social media addiction.It's not like this technology will ever be taken down. It's too big and the Zuckericebergs are not really the ones who get to control the whole machine. They're just in on it. Besides, control of information at this magnitude is weapon unto itself. And the world wide industrial complex would not allow any deviation from its own plans of social conformity.
That video be gone! I guess old Tucker's handlers decided to censor it. Didn't fit with the program did it. Too Bad. Maybe old Tucker is just all mouth and no balls.
Posted 21 February 2019 - 03:22 PM
This is legal tender:
One ring to bind them...
Posted 21 February 2019 - 03:04 PM
Food is power, we use it to control behavior,... we do not apologize.
Catherine Bertino, Exec. Dir., UN Food Distribution. From a UN speech Sept. 14, 1997
Food is Power!
"Food is power! We use it to change behavior. Some may call that bribery. We do not apologize." These are the threatening words of Catherine Bertini, Executive Director of the United Nations World Food Program. Ms. Bertini, was our very own former US Assistant Secretary of Agriculture. Ms. Bertini was a featured speaker at the globalist UN World Food Summit in November of 1996.
Many believe the United Nations is the focal point for the global restructuring process. It is also believed by many that the coming crisis of food shortages, famine, and political and social turmoil will lead to Marshall Law allowing socialist directorates to proclaim a revamping and restructuring of the economic system which will solve the significant concerns facing humanity.
Both Hitler and Stalin taught and believed that true Socialism would begin in one country (Germany or Russia); then, like an octopus it would grow to encompass the entire globe. Larry Bates, astute publisher of Monetary and Economic Review journal, in his book The New Economic Disorder, touches on this plan. He writes, "I have said, for many years that the term 'New World Order' is merely a code word for one-world socialism, with an elite ruling class to govern the rest of us under their demonic system." Bates also believes that, "The mechanism that has been set up to manage us all is a world government, an antichrist system, headquartered in the United Nations."
Proclaiming that, "The New World Order will be founded on the rule, all for one and one for all," a World Goodwill bulletin summarized the Illuminati's blueprint for economic control by loftily declaring: "The New World Order will recognize that the produce of the world, the natural resources of the planet, and its riches do not belong to one nation but should be shared by all...A fair and properly organized distribution of the wheat, oil and the mineral wealth of the world will be developed . . . All this will be worked out in relation to the whole."
Colonel Edward M. House, the founder of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), was President Woodrow Wilson's top foreign policy advisor. Col. House was one of the men who first conceived the League of Nations, the U.N.'s failed predecessor. Col. House once exclaimed: "The goal is Socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx."
In recent years, especially since FDR, more and more presidents have decided to exercise the powers they derive from un-Constitutional Executive Orders either to bypass Congress entirely or to speed up the process of wielding governmental powers. [Executive Orders are outrageously unconstitutional!] President Clinton and President Bush have been the most flagrant violators. Mr. Clinton and Mr. Bush have issued Executive Order after Executive Order. As a result, the United States is now ruled directly from the White House and the stage is set for the restructuring of America to act in full accord under the control of One World Government operated by the Illuminati. Among the Executive Orders already in existence providing for control of people's everyday lives and seizure of private property are the following:
E.O. 13010 - Seizure of the "Critical Infrastructure." Seizure of computer systems, the Internet, satellite systems and telephone and communications systems, by the federal government. Empowerment of the US Armed Forces to perform the functions of government in event of national emergency.
E.O. 10995 - Seizure of the communications media.
E.O. 10997 - Seizure of all electric power and utility systems, fuels, and minerals.
E.O. 10998 - Seizure of all food supplies and resources and all farms and farm equipment.
E.O. 10999 and E.O. 11005 - Seizure of all means of transportation, including company and personal cars, trucks, trains, airlines, river and ocean vessels, and vehicles and conveyances of any kind, and control over all highways, waterways, and air routes.
E.O. 1100 - Mandatory induction of any and all America workers for government projects or missions, placing the entire US work force under the federal government.
E.O. 1101 - Seizure of all health, education, and welfare facilities and equipment.
E.O. 11002 - Empowers the Postmaster General to register all USA men, women, and children and to issue a national I.D. card.
E.O. 11004 - Seizure of all housing and finances and the power to direct the relocation of people and resources into designated communities.
E.O. 11051 - Empowers the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) with the authority to independently put Executive Orders into effect in event of increased international tension or economic, financial, or military crises.
E.O. 13083 - Centralizes all government powers and authority—national, state, and local—in the federal government. Overrides the 10th Amendment to the US Constitution and makes all state and local laws and regulations subservient and inferior to those of the federal government. Also empowers the federal government to control the social and religious behavior of the people by stating that federal law shall "define the moral, political, and legal character of their lives."
This hideously sinister Executive Order (13083), issued May 14, 1998 by President Clinton, undoubtedly one of the most shocking of all. It totally undermines and destroys the Bill of Rights and gives the federal government the awesome power even to define the "moral character" of peoples' lives!
The general public was told little or nothing about this Executive Order by either the media or their representatives in the Congress. A small group of determined patriots caused an uproar about this Stalinist oriented infringement on the peoples' rights and liberties. On Internet and on radio talk shows they complained with a mighty voice. Amazingly, possibly because the biannual federal election for the Congress was only a few months away, the Congress moved quickly to nullify Executive Order 13083. Shortly after the November 1998 elections, the White House announced that the President intended to reissue the nullified Executive Order.
Posted 21 February 2019 - 02:57 AM
Divided by 3rds
Posted 21 February 2019 - 02:44 AM
Posted 21 February 2019 - 02:34 AM
Defensive architecture is an option. It can be weaponized as well. Imagine a school shaped like this:Only the 'cell' space would be classroom size.A large open space contains this form:Expand the idea further and take a look at a community:Would you feel safe having your children learn in this environment?
The School As A Panopticon?One of the angles being fore fronted appears to make it a case of private schools. Parents are complaining that private schools fleece money and don’t provide adequate safety and services. While this could be true or false, none of these schools forced the parents to get their children admitted there. They could have opted for nearby government school but they don’t. Why? Because ‘educational standard’ of these government schools are not good, they may say. But how did they know that? Parents in general have scanty idea of what constitutes ‘educational standards’ beyond board results. Schools are simply status symbol for the middle class. They opt for such ‘high class’ schools not because they have any clear evidence of the quality of education or other services they provide. They get their child admitted by any means just going by the name, fame, building and the ‘status’ of school. In such a case, complaining about them is like a drunkard diagnosed with liver cirrhosis blaming the nearby wine shop.The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) is India’s largest education board, has issued an advisory about safety and security in schools on September 12. The circular has asked schools to carry out a security audit and report back on its website within two months. Interestingly, a similar circular was issued on 23rd February, 2017 focusing on ‘Safety of school children in the school bus’. The February circular fixed the responsibility on the school management in following CBSE guidelines, adhering to by-laws and other circulars issued by them from time to time. The February circular also exhorts parents and says, ‘parents are equally responsible for the safety of their children during school journeys’. One wonders if the responsibilities of a body like CBSE ends by issuing such circulars and advisories and fix responsibilities for others? Don’t regulatory bodies have mechanisms of regular checking or inspections to ensure that those who don’t comply with such norms may be punished? Or else it is like police pasting the IPC regulation for theft or other crimes in each mohalla telling them about the provision of punishment and fixing everyone to be responsible for their own safety and rest in peace!The CBSE directive had asked the schools to install CCTV cameras at all vulnerable points within the school premises and ensure that the cameras are functional. It is important to note that the bathroom where the child was killed had the CCTV installed, albeit it was not working. But who will look into all the CCTV camera feed all the time? What will happen to the huge amount of data generated every day? Who will decide which are vulnerable areas? Is a classroom vulnerable? Some say each of the classes too will have CCTV cameras. This will transform the school into a space of indiscriminate surveillance and tracking where everyone is seen as a potential criminal. It will no longer remain a school but a dragnet. Christopher Slobogin, a Vanderbilt University law professor, argues that surveillance dragnets are inherently unfair. By definition, they capture the innocent and the guilty indiscriminately. In doing so, they create a culture of fear. Schools, thus, will become a prototype of ‘Panopticon’, a prison design proposed by Jeremy Bentham in 1787 and popularized by Michel Foucault where inmates would be living under ‘ever anxious awareness of being observed’. Is that what we want our schools to be?
Posted 17 February 2019 - 01:20 PM
The FBI is Trying Amazon’s Facial-Recognition Software
While Amazon is now a significant supplier of technology to the government—much of it through its cloud business, AWS, which includes the CIA and Defense Department as customers—it is less clear how its facial recognition software is being used in the public sector. The Daily Beast reported the company pitched the software to Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials last summer, a move that has lawmakers and Amazon employees asking questions. The company does not list any federal clients on its customer page, and currently only identifies as a customer one local law enforcement agency, the Washington County Sheriff Office. According to press reports, the city of Orlando recently began a second pilot of Amazon's Rekognition software.
The FBI did not respond to questions about its use of Amazon Rekognition from Nextgov.
Posted 05 February 2019 - 01:12 AM
Yuri Bezmenov (alias Tomas Schuman), a Soviet KGB defector, explains in detail his scheme for the KGB process of subversion and takeover of target societies at a lecture in Los Angeles, 1983.Yuri Bezmenov was a former KGB propagandist who was assigned to New Dehli, India - and defected to the West in 1970.Bezmenov explains his background, some of his training, and exactly how Soviet propaganda is spread in other countries in order to subvert their teachers, politicians, and other policy makers to a mindset receptive to the Soviet ideology.He also explains in detail the goal of Soviet propaganda as total subversion of another country and the four-step formula for achieving this goal.DemoralizationDestabilizationCrisisNormalization
Here's something that confirms Yuri's story.
Great video from a man who told the truth!